At the station Walldorf-Wiesloch I had to listen to a little talk today. While further back the Jehovah's Witnesses were grinning at each other's faces, a good housewife from Walldorf was echauffierte herself about the fact that I still denounced the six-year-old from Walldorf, who had to die because of the Watchtower blood doctrine. I don't know the truth and the family and the neighbours, the surroundings and generally.
The woman knew the boy but knew nothing else about the people, had no further information, but because the boy had been buried in an evangelical way, I was to remain silent about his death. It was none of our business what he had died of. Imagine that you are murdered and nobody cares about it and those who want to care about it are even silenced!
Wording of the call to silence
Woman: Where did you get this information? Me: From the paper. Woman: From the newspaper and the newspaper always tells the truth. Me: The newspaper had to lie, the words "Jehovah's Witnesses" and "blood transfusion" could not be mentioned, but about three out of ten newspapers have formulated it in such a way that nothing else remains. Woman: I'm telling you honestly because I knew the boy and the family, and he was in class with my daughter. That's not nice what you're doing, I was at the funeral, that was an evangelical funeral, that has nothing to do with Jehovah's Witnesses, and so what you're doing is okay, it's fine with me, I'm not religious either, I don't think it's great, but that's, so it's really difficult for me to see because he doesn't have to be there now. What you are doing is good, it has something to do with the boy ... Me: Why did the (mother of the six-year-old) refuse treatment? Woman: I don't know. Me: I see. Woman: I've decided for myself, it has nothing to do with myself. The boy died. I can't change anything about that and it's terrible. I would ask you, because it really hit me and my family and our environment, not to spread it that way. They don't know the truth, they don't know the people. Me: If that were not true, the Watchtower Society would have taken legal action against it long ago. Woman: Hhhhhhh! Me: That's how it is. Woman: I'll tell you again. Me: Just like this claim that Jehovah's Witnesses bleed to death, I've been running it for three ... Woman: I'm not in the mood to get upset now, so... so, uh, I'll tell you again ... Me: They don't take legal action against it and that's a clear sign ... Woman: I was at the funeral. Nah, the family just doesn't want that (incomprehensible word). Yes. Me: I'm talking about the Watchtower Society goes against everyone ... Woman: I'm ending this discussion now. I am sorry that you are not listening to me ... Me: I've been listening to you, you haven't been listening to me. I replied that the Watchtower Society is not taking legal action against it ... Woman: But yes ... so what has ... Me: I must not finish ... Woman: Nah, because, it's about, a child died, that's the only thing that matters ... Me: No ... Woman: That is the point, that is the point, and it is not the point for us, it has nothing to do with us, what he died of, that is the point, a child died. Point. Out. Me: In my eyes, he was murdered by a doctrine. Woman: Hhhhhh! You don't know anything about that. Me: There's no other way. Woman: Okay.
After driving home quite disturbed, I made a list with the points that came to my mind immediately. Just to calm me down a bit. After all, it could actually be that there are other reasons for the death of the six-year-old from Walldorf than the blood doctrine of the Watchtower Society. Although. I can't think of any.
List of conspicuous factors
To me, the woman's speech sounded as if she wanted to restore the beautiful old idyll in Walldorf. If now the family are not Jehovah's Witnesses, why don't they have a short legal act forbid the publicly presented assertion "Six-year-old from Walldorf died of Jehovah's blood doctrine (30.01.2018)"? According to the then established legal situation I would then have to pay the court costs. That's no trick!
What the boy died of is completely unknown to the woman. It seems that she is only interested in the intact world of front gardens made of gravel and stones (as they are often kept in Baden-Württemberg to save time - you need the time to sweep the sidewalk). I'm horrified at the thought of how little respect someone can have for the early death of a six-year-old. If this woman is really so upset, it must be her first question: "What really killed the boy?" Then she would have to consider everything that could speak for the death of the six-year-old by the Watchtower doctrine. But as a neighbour or acquaintance, it's more likely that you have a duty to lay the blanket of silence over everything.
Legal steps no argument
Whenever I pointed out that the Watchtower Society was taking no legal action whatsoever against the publicly presented allegations "Six-year-old from Walldorf died of Jehovah's blood doctrine (30.01.2018)" and "Jehovah's Witnesses bleed to death", the woman hastily and ice-coldly interrupted me. Why? Was this woman afraid of the facts that would necessarily result from the behaviour of the Watchtower Society? The Watchtower Society takes legal action against every fart. It would have long been active with 25 lawyers if the allegations "six-year-old from Walldorf died of Jehovah's blood doctrine (30.01.2018)" and "Jehovah's Witnesses bleed to death" were false.
There are no Watchtower funerals, no Jehovah's funerals, no WARNING funerals, no bloodless vampire dropper funerals, no New World funerals, no hospital liaison committee success parties, or anything like that. What this woman so confidently uses as evidence that Jehovah's Witnesses have nothing to do with the death of the six-year-old from Walldorf is just the normal case, a Protestant funeral. For reasons of camouflage, they probably preferred to keep their distance. The Watchtower religion can only bury some of its outstanding false teachers under Masonic pyramids. She can't do more.
No statements about the parents
This woman, dedicated to the great silence, could simply pull the data from the imprint of this page so that the family of the six-year-old from Walldorf, if they are not Jehovah's Witnesses, could get in touch with me. But no! That seems to be too much for these people. Why do they rather heat up an acquaintance in such a way, that she takes me at the station Walldorf-Wiesloch so in the lack? What do these people expect from such a freehand, almost artificial-looking appeal without any real information? This in itself indicates that the consequences of the Watchtower blood doctrine must be concealed at all costs. The Watchtower Blood Doctrine forbids human blood, although human flesh has never been allowed. That is the fish's bicycle, the hole in the women's underpants, the moonlight on hot summer lunches and the bald shampoo.
Rigorous interruption when it comes to the Watchtower Society
The fact that a woman not involved in the Watchtower doctrine thus indulges in suppressing any attempt of a logical connection between the silence of the Watchtower Society and the truthfulness of the allegations "Six-year-olds from Walldorf died of Jehovah's blood doctrine (30.01.2018)" and "Jehovah's Witnesses bleed to death" is simply astonishing. One gets clairaudient. What interest does this compassionate woman have in suppressing the compelling arguments? I had to stop my speech three times because the lady wanted me to. What is the point of such a technique? Shouldn't an acquaintance of these people be interested in the truth? What makes this woman to go through with her program with all ruthlessness? I suppose that this poor woman was lied to the letter by Jehovah's Witnesses.
The woman doesn't know, but she wants to prevent exactly what she doesn't know.
Does this woman take the fight for the lives of Jehovah's Witnesses as green-left propaganda or laundry detergent advertising? Can't people see today where the toad migration ends and the doctrinal human murder begins? Oh well, as long as the victim is buried evangelically, everything is fine! What a beautiful new world this is, in which the newspapers are forbidden to use certain terms (Jehovah's Witnesses and blood transfusion) and after half a year the true circumstances of the death of the six-year-old from Walldorf are still not conclusively clarified! But to put people under pressure to keep their mouths shut, that's possible!
I can't forget the six-year-old from Walldorf, who had to die because of this human blood human flesh lie of the Watchtower Society, and I don't want others to forget him either. That is why I will never be able to get involved with spongy morality. The peace in the front garden settlement in Walldorf is over forever for this six-year-old and I would like the woman who thought I had to silence me today to manage to understand the consequences of the bleeding death of the six-year-old from Walldorf at some point even remotely. That would be nice.